The editorial office of "Hrodna Pravda" almost completely rushed to social networks to comment on Tsikhanouskaya's visit to Kyiv
"Shame on you, buy journalism courses for your employees," they were advised. In the comments under the newspaper's post, a chorus of indignant voices is created by the female employees themselves — from correspondents to the editor-in-chief.

The publication "Hrodna Pravda" today posted an article in its Threads account with news about Sviatlana Tsikhanouskaya's visit to Kyiv. The text of the publication more closely resembles an aggressive propaganda leaflet:
"Today, the expired Sveta fulfilled her long-held dream. She saw a "wonderful independent Belarus" under her leadership. The leader of the fighters arrived in Kyiv, where representatives of the regime organized a "program of events" for her: a showy laying of flowers at the graves of mercenary Nazis (may the earth be like glass wool to them), then, hoping that the Russian drone would not miss after all, they drove her through the streets of Kyiv."
"This is the future she envisions for the residents of the republic, while casually pondering the flow of Western money," the channel's authors wrote.
The post was accompanied by a video shot from a car, showing Sviatlana driving through the streets of the Ukrainian capital past destroyed buildings.
Almost the entire editorial team came to comment on this thread. The editor-in-chief of "Hrodna Pravda" Tatsiana Siargeyeva, her deputy Anzhelika Kisliak, correspondents Milana Dudko and Marharyta Siauko, columnist Alena Khudzik, and the editor of the newspaper's internet resource Nastassia Adosiy were all noted in the comments.
The main message was to insult Tsikhanouskaya and the Ukrainian side as much as possible, while simultaneously emphasizing Belarus's supposed "peacefulness."
"Thank God that he saved us from such "Svetas". Let her ride and play for the public, as long as she doesn't poke her little hands into the affairs of Belarus. Shoo-shoo us ))))", writes deputy editor-in-chief Anzhelika Kisliak.
"Clown," comments columnist Khudzik.
"And this is what they wanted for Belarus?!!! No thank you. The Father saved us," "Looks at what would have happened in Minsk if this inadequate person had come to power. God saved us from her."
"A wonderful "future," nothing more to say. She came to a country where there is a war to catch some hype. Are the ratings really worthless? Ordinary people want peace and stability, not to be a testing ground for another Western "democracy" trash," indignantly states editor-in-chief Tatsiana Siargeyeva.

Other users try to dispute these accusations. For example, to the remark:
"It's good that such people are not in Belarus," they remind: "Yes, people like you are in Belarus. Or in prisons."

To the author of the comment "Nightmare, no words, what is she doing," they clarify: "What is she doing?? Is it her who attacked Ukraine? Or is it her who provided her country as a staging ground for an attack on a neighbor?? Or is it something else??".

Some users expressed themselves even more sharply regarding the publication itself and its authors:
"The comments are some kind of surreal 'yabatski' (Lukashenka supporters). They themselves let troops across the border in violation of the Constitution of the Republic of Belarus, they themselves helped and are helping to guide drones and UAVs, and they say that "Svetka" and "Zelem" are to blame."

"F***ing hell, for one of the major public pages of a regional city in Belarus to write such a disgusting text? Shame on you, buy journalism courses for your employees."

Another group of commentators responded in an ironic and sharp manner:
"Oh, how the 'yabatski' got excited, are they envious? The mustachioed collective farmer only goes to the SWAMPS to beg for money, but they're not giving it anymore," "Are the news stories over? Have you finished the debt? Is Macron not calling anymore?", "Oh, really! And would you have wanted your leader to come there? But, never mind, he will come someday, but in a different status."

In addition to the "Hrodna Pravda" thread, pro-Lukashenka commentators also stormed other social networks. However, their messages there are not distinguished by originality and more closely resemble the work of bot farms.
"Who is she?", "Where did Seryoga go?", "In what capacity did she arrive?", "And how long will they keep traveling!?" — write the traditional bot questions.

Now reading
Belarusians complain that their favorite panda-branded curd snacks are 'not the same'. Has the recipe changed after being transferred to 'Savushkin Product'?
Belarusians complain that their favorite panda-branded curd snacks are 'not the same'. Has the recipe changed after being transferred to 'Savushkin Product'?
Political Prisoner Kim Samusenka Compared the World at the Moments of His Imprisonment and Release: Everything Is Not Bad for European Civilization, and Therefore, for Belarusians
Comments
Калі прапагандыстам нельга так рабіць, дык можа і вам трэба пра Каржа праўду пісаць?